
Originally Posted by
Dynamo of Eternia
Ok, I guess I am in the dark on this one. What exactly is the "towel trick"? This will be good for me to know in case mine ever goes out. I got mine during Demeber of 05 (just after Christmas), so I'm not sure if mine is from an early enough batch to potentially have a lot of these early system issues, and anything I can do to prevent a problem from happening and to fix things if ever a problem does occur will be good knowledge to have.
I understand where you are coming from. And all I can say on that front is that it's a matter of finding balance between the first and third party.
If Sony doesn't get enough units moved, then there isn't enough potential for a 3rd party PS3 exclusive title to sell well enough to make the kind of profit that a similar title on PS2 would make (or as much as putting the same title on all 3 new gen systems).
While it would be bad for Sony to become overly first-party-centric as Nintendo aparenty has in the past, if Sony were to make some heavy hitting first party titles, then it could draw more attention to the system. More attention to the system would hopefully equal more systems being purchased and put in more households. And with more systems out there, it would leave greater potential for a PS3 third party game to sell enough units to remain exlcusive to the system.
It's hard to say how things will pan out.
Here's the point, though. There's supposed to be a SHORTAGE of PS3s, yet you can easily walk into a store, pick up one and buy it without really having to hunt for it. It would be one thing for that to be the case if Sony had released a huge over abundance of it well beyond what their initial projected number of launch-to-Christmas systems (meaning, back before they kept reducing the number, and reducing it again, etc).
But, here we are just a few weeks after Christmas and you can easily get it. Heck, it wasn't that hard to get just days after Christmas.
You may look at 2 or 3 PS3's sitting there in a store as being a small number and nothing to worry about, but this close after Christmas, that says a lot.
Plus, you have to consider that the PS3's still aren't being produced and delivered to stores in extremely huge numbers. Depending on the chain of store, location, and population around the area, many stores may only be getting in 3 to 6 systems at a time (give or take). So, if most if not all of those systems sit there for days before being sold, while the Wii isn't even so much as touching the shelf, again, that says a lot.
I was in a local Target a week ago, and they had 5 or 6 of the 60g PS3s sitting there in the glass case. And mind you, given the size of the game cases at Taget, there wasn't room to fit many more in the case (so, it's possibe that they may have had more sitting in the back somewhere to be put out once those other ones sold).
And plus, I live near the Naperville Illinois area. While not everyone is rich, there is a rather large population of well-to-do people around here who could easily afford the $600 price of PS3, and yet it still sits on the shelf.
Last year, it was a good couple of months or more after Christmas before you could readily walk into a store and get a 360. And thus far, the same is holding true with the Wii.
Also, then there's the ebay factor. Last year, the 360's at the insanely highly inflated ebay prices were still selling rather well. The same was the case this past holiday season with the Wii. And, let's not forget that the same was true with the PS2 when it launched.
But, aside from a few that sold well right around the time of launch, the PS3 market on ebay dropped off considerably, with many systems either selling for not to much above retail cost, and with many just being returned to stores having not been sold on ebay at all.
So, all of this adds up to people, even the same die-hard people who paid ebay prices for 360 and Wii, not being nearly as interested in PS3, apparently.
As for PS2 sales being great, yeah, that's awesome, but it doesn't help the future of PS3 all that much. The reason PS2 sold well was because it was readily available with little difficulty in finding it, and it was cheap. Plus, it has been the most popular system of the last generation, with a lot of games available for it, many now at lower 'greatest hit' prices. Despite both being under the "Playstation" name, the general vibe I've been getting is that many people's opinons of the PS2 and PS3 tend to be very different. While they may still like and praise PS2, they aren't so crazy about it's 'successor'.
Sure, the PS3 may be backwards compatible, but still, clearly anyone who just bought a PS2 has a brand-spanking new system that plays their PS2 games just fine (I've heard little complaints about the slim model malfunctioning like the older, larger one), so until some heavy hitting exclusives come out for PS3, there's little reason for people to upgrade. The backwards compatibility may be nice, but since they already have a system to play their PS2 games on, it doesn't make the PS3 necessary at all. And while it may be more optimal to have one system that plays all of your games rather than multplie systems for different formats, the slim PS2 is so small that even if the recent purchasers of that eventually get a Wii or a 360, it's not like having one of the newer systems in addition to the slim PS2 is going to horribly clog up their entertainment center.
Also, Xbox 360 does not cost double that of the Wii. The more expensive $400 version is only $150 more than the Wii. The CHEAP version of PS3 is double the price of the Wii, and the more expensive version is $100 MORE than the Wii.
The problem with PS3 is that they've gone for TOO hardcore of an audience. They've practically priced themselves out of the water. While Xbox 360 is also going for more of a hardcore audience, they are still priced reasonably enough to gain a reasonable amount of casual gamers and keep themselves competitive across the board.
Though, I also think there's more to this than just price. Because apparently a lot of the same die-hard gamers who were willing to pay $1,000 for a 360 on ebay last year wouldn't pay around the same this year for PS3, nor will they even walk into a store and buy one that sitting there for retail price.
The PS2 was successful for multiple reasons (despite the isses that I have with the systems that I have stated many times). It was competitively priced, it had DVD built into it (which at the time had been around for over 3 years and was clearly going to replace VHS sooner or later at that point). It was $300, the same price as the PS1 when it first came out. The system had plenty in it to keep the die-hard gamers and technophiles happy, while still being reasonably priced enough for the more casual consumer. And that just held even more true as price drops occured.
This time around, instead of DVD, the big thing is Blu-Ray, but many people are leary of jumping on the format since it has HD-DVD as competition and it is undecided as to who will be the winner. Heck, even the one person I know (meaning in person, and not on the internet) who even has a PS3 has even said that he will not jump on getting any Blu-Ray movies because of the war with HD-DVD. And he is a pretty big movie fan/DVD collector who also has an HDTV, so he would basically be the Target audience for that. And what's worse is that the inclusion of Blu-Ray is the biggest part of what's jacking up the price on the system.
I mean, let's face it, a big part of the appeal of PS2 for consumers this past Christmas was the $129 price tag. The problem is that I don't think we will ever see PS3 at anywhere near that price (and if it ever will happen, we are a LONG ways off from it).
Even when the new systems start to drop in price, PS3 will still continually be much more expensive than the competition. Even if it eventually/gradually drops $200 off of it's price over the course of time, then at that point its two respective models will still be the same price as the launch price of the two models of Xbox 360. That's not going to be much of an incentive for the casual gaming audience.
What this boils down to is that unless Sony really pulls something out of their butts to get the systems into more homes, then there won't be enough systems around for the 3rd party companies who have developed exclusive content for the PS2 to continue to do so for PS3. In order for those games to profit, they will need to be on multiple systems, or exclusive to a system that is in more homes than the PS3. So, either Sony will lose those games entirely, or they will at least be available on other systems, thus giving people even less of a reason to spend the extra cash for the PS3 when they can play essentially the same thing elsewhere for less money.