I, for one, certainly do not hate everything. I mentioned a lot of stuff I like quite a bit. And I liked
Dark Knight Returns. I just said there's stuff that's a lot better. Most of what I was saying, though, is centered around its supposed influence--which I felt was being drastically over stated by several posters.
- - - Updated - - -
I wasn't talking about the general public. Surveys seem to indicate that roughly 90% of our country doesn't read. But for people that do, the stuff I mentioned was eye-opening in a way that a Batman comic could never be.
If you haven't even heard of the stuff I mentioned, then I assume you only read mainstream, mostly super-hero comics.
To be clear, I am in no way denigrating you for that and I have no problem with it whatsoever. But you are missing out on a lot of the best the medium has to offer. Give them a try, you might really like some of it.
And, again, I agree that Dark Knight influenced mainstream super-hero comics--no argument there.
- - - Updated - - -
Again, I am not talking about the general public. Most people don't read books, graphic novels, comics or anything else, so there's no point in discussing the influence a comic has on them. It has none. The general public is as unaware of Dark Knight Returns as they are of most of the authors studied in an undergraduate comparative literature course.
I agree that sex and violence can be an integral part of serious literature. My point was that tarting up Catwoman and killing the Joker doesn't equate to an adult version of Batman.
- - - Updated - - -
Are you actually saying that you can't disagree with someone without either resorting to childish one liners or responding in such an immature, inflammatory manner that you would be admonished by the moderators?
That's sad.
But I did find it amusing that you accused me of being elitist while I was discussing comic books and Batman. I had no idea my tastes were so high brow. Maybe the Queen of England will invite me to tea to debate the Frank Miller ouevre.
