Arthur,
I agree on may thing but let me point out a couple of things where I don't agree:
I think the work "inexcusable" is exagerated.
Mind you, I'd like to have action figures too, but to achive them, you need, first of all all new toolings for the bodies.
Then, new toolings for all the internal mechanims and engineering to make them working.
All this is simply not within Mattel's budget for this line.
I have my own criticims about MOTUC sometime, but I see the economics involved.
Actually is quite the opposite!If a figure like Teela lasted over three days that's a good indication that sales are dropping.
Teela and Webstor are the first figures in the subscription program: it was a given they would have lasted longer as many fans don't have to rush anymore to the site to get them.
And Teela lasted half the time Webstor lasted!
Sure Teela is probably more popular, she has two heads, but that gives no indication the sales are dropping!
Again, I see your points, I just wanted to give more info about those specific topics![]()


Reply With Quote





And, I would say that Mattel are the creators of most of their own problems, by these days being (if I'm honest) one of the most well-intentioned but incompetent toy companies in the history of the industry. EVERYTHING Mattel touch is badly-handled, and whilst I think they've improved things a lot recently, this misleading wording in their advertising, coupled with Toyguru's bad phrasing and tone in his answer here, is another example of Mattel handling something badly.






