UPDATED Trademarks List: New, Unused And/Or Notable

[KingRandor82]

Add Glimmer

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...1:d8nu4a.38.16

[dorrmann]

Add Glimmer

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...1:d8nu4a.38.16

Link doesn't work.

[Darkspecter]

Add Glimmer

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...1:d8nu4a.38.16

I can't get the link to work (it says session has expired when I click it), but I can't find Glimmer.

The only Glimmer I can find that's a toy, is the horse for Barbie:

Word Mark GLIMMER
Goods and Services IC 028. US 022 023 038 050. G & S: TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING AND DOLL ACCESSORIES, DOLL PLAYSETS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR.

Filing Date January 11, 2005
Owner (REGISTRANT) MATTEL, INC. CORPORATION DELAWARE LAW
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

Is this the one you found or a different one?

[CarKrash]

Well it's Mattel and it's a trademark for Glimmer. It's also for "TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS." So would this not work as a re-use of trademarks? or does the trademark have to be "action figure" specific?

[Darkspecter]

Well it's Mattel and it's a trademark for Glimmer. It's also for "TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS." So would this not work as a re-use of trademarks? or does the trademark have to be "action figure" specific?

I think it has to be in the action figure section.

Here's She-Ra's:

Word Mark SHE-RA
Goods and Services IC 028. US 022 023 038 050. G & S: TOY ACTION FIGURES. FIRST USE: 20100615. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20100615

It's hard to say though.

[markatisu]

I think it has to be in the action figure section.

Here's She-Ra's:

It's hard to say though.

That is not how it works.

A trademark is a trademark, its based on the general type of item. They do not have to kill the current Glimmer in order to have an action figure. If they wanted to make Glimmer toilet paper then they might, but I guess only if the toy Glimmer was featured

[Darkspecter]

That is not how it works.

A trademark is a trademark, its based on the general type of item. They do not have to kill the current Glimmer in order to have an action figure. If they wanted to make Glimmer toilet paper then they might, but I guess only if the toy Glimmer was featured

Well, they can't make a Glimmer cell phone or furniture. They have live trademarks.

[markatisu]

Well, they can't make a Glimmer cell phone or furniture. They have live trademarks.

I saw the cell phone one and immediately looked it up, I was so disappointed. Its not fabulous or even shiny

[josh]

I'm amazed there's a delineation between dolls and action figures.

Though I suppose it does help the government make more money by having more categories so similar names could be trademarked separately under each.

[KingRandor82]

Well, do consider that Hasbro recently trademarked the name Shockwave, and immediately tossed it on a Mighty Mugg just for the sake of having the name used so that it would definitely be theirs.

Mattel might've done the same thing with Glimmer; it's a thought.

[Tallstar]

A couple new trademarks have been added to the list:

KYLE RECCULA - Looks like a real name. May or may not belong to MOTUC.

FIGHTING FOE MEN - Falls under "notable". *Probably* going to be part of Vikor's bio.

Also, HE-MAN OF THE NORTH was filed, but I'm not adding that to the list because we already know that's going to be for Vikor and that he's coming.

[Calderon]

KYLE RECCULA - Looks like a real name. May or may not belong to MOTUC.

Has Bow a real name already? Bow, real name Kyle Reccula (sounds weird)
Perhaps we are going to see the first Galactic Guardian (they are all human type and that name could fit).

[WDWFreak53]

Kyle Reccula sounds like a real name for Mekaneck for some reason.

[facet]

who do you think wrap trap is. I'm thinking he might be the horde mummy from the conceptual drawings in the early stages of development.

[Reboot]

Well, do consider that Hasbro recently trademarked the name Shockwave, and immediately tossed it on a Mighty Mugg just for the sake of having the name used so that it would definitely be theirs.

Mattel might've done the same thing with Glimmer; it's a thought.

Hasbro have had the name "Shockwave" back since 2006 or so - they tossed it on a random mini-con during Transformers: Cybertron to secure the name, then used it for a full-on homage in Transformers Animated.

That is not how it works.

A trademark is a trademark, its based on the general type of item. They do not have to kill the current Glimmer in order to have an action figure. If they wanted to make Glimmer toilet paper then they might, but I guess only if the toy Glimmer was featured

Yeah - Hasbro were recently denied a ® for "Airachnid" on the basis that it was 'too similar' to Mattel's "Arachnoid" ®. While phones and furniture are pretty distant from toys, two types of toys might well fall under "too similar to grant both to different parties."

[Darkness]

Where have I heard Fighting Foe Men before? I know I've heard it.

[Flint]

I just noticed Modulock was trademarked... Oh man I hope we see him next year, but it is doubtful.

[geooco]

Where have I heard Fighting Foe Men before? I know I've heard it.

As I recall, it was an early prototype name for the Masters of the Universe toyline.

[bcrduke]

Kyle Reccula sounds like a real name for Mekaneck for some reason.

I thought the same thing. Maybe just because it sounds like retina?

[Tallstar]

As I recall, it was an early prototype name for the Masters of the Universe toyline.

Part of the story is in the art book.

[Uki]

I could see Kyle Reccula for Mekanek, Bow, Flipshot, Hydron, or one of the other Protectors... Heck, it could be Ram Man, but I see him as more of a Murphy.

[gbagok]

I sure hope Bow's 'real' name isn't Reccula. He's already got enough issues without his name reminding me of this:

[Darkspecter]

A couple new trademarks have been added to the list:

KYLE RECCULA - Looks like a real name. May or may not belong to MOTUC.

It's Josh's real name.

Josh
Real Name: Kyle

[Veebs]

Kyle Reccula sounds more Monster High to me.

[guitargod694]

Kyle Reccula sounds more Monster High to me.

Agreed. I'd be surprised if that was for MotUC.
But it wouldn't be the first time I was surprised by one of the real names.