Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Answers to WTFWTK 2.49!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Color'licious! JVS3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    29,293

    Answers to WTFWTK 2.49!

    Mattel has once again provided answers to your questions.
    Thanks again to them for taking the time to answer these!
    Check out their answers to your Round 49 questions!

    This round of questions were selected by Reboot,
    and proofed against old Q&As by Uncle Montork.
    Thanks to them for their help!

    -------------------

    1. Reboot:
    Given that you said that you "lost [your] shirts a bit on King Hsss", where does that leave Mermista who you've said in the past will have a similar arrangement (albeit for the lower half, to swap legs & mermaid tail)? Whenever she happens, will she still be a standard $20 figure or will she fall into the oversized $30+ sku?


    When doing a more expensive figure like Hssss or a fully tool’d figure (i.e. Ram Man) we will try to bank them in the same year as less expensive figures (like Faker) to help balance out the cost. This is one reason we have the line figures out month to month for the next few years.

    2. robaczek:
    When the 4H are sculpting a MOTUC figure, what is the actual size of the prototype sculpt in relation to the final MOTUC toy?


    For MOTUC it is done 1:1. Several Horsemen sculpts were on display at SDCC last year, including Hssss, Bow, Shadow Beast, Preternia He-Man and Vikor.

    3. Tuukka:
    When we get weapons made of soft rubber, as with Roboto, they are often warped in the package. Why not use hard plastic on guns, swords, clubs, etc?


    For Roboto we needed to use a softer plastic so his weapon hands would snap onto his arm attachment. Originally Roboto was sculpted like his vintage toy. We had to change the plug mechanism so the arm attachments would be the same as Trap Jaw and this, along with current revised safety requirements, called for a softer plastic. Many times we have to go with materials that work logistically or per regulations over what we would want to do artistically.

    4. Zargon:
    Since Castle Grayskull's price has been estimated to be $200-$300 (when and if it happens) and figures/beasts run from $20-$40, what would be the estimated prices of the upcoming vehicle(s) by size? (small = Sky Sled-sized, medium = Land Shark-sized, large = Spydor-sized)


    It is a bit too early to tell, but a mid-sized vehicle like the one planned for fall 2011 will likely run between $30 to $50 dollars depending on how complex it is.

    5. Count Marzo:
    Is "Galen Nycroft" an available real name for Modulok when and if you get to him?


    Currently, we do not have a trademark on this name, but if it is available when, and if, we get to Modulok this is the name we would want to use based on the 1987 licensor kits!

    --------------------

    Click here to ask questions in Round 51!
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 1.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 2.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 3.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 4.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 5.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 6.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 7.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 8.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 9.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 10.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 11.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 12.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 13.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 14.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 15.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 16.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 17.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 18.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 19.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 20.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 21.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 22.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 23.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 24.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 25.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 26.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 27.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 28.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 29.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 30.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 31.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 32.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 33.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 34.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 35.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 36.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 37.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 38.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 39.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 40.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 41.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 42.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 43.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 44.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 45.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 46.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 47.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 48.
    And, have fun discussing Mattel's answers to your Round 49 questions!

  2. #2
    Hover Robots in MOTUC! RockinHard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Slime Pit
    Posts
    5,579
    The vehicle will be mid-sized. Hmmm.
    My seller/trader/buyer feedback:
    http://he-man.org/forums/boards/showthread.php?t=195461

    MOTUC Most Wanted: 1) Skeletor's Robot Knights 2) Stridor 3) Night Stalker 4) Tung Lashor 5) Squeeeze 6) Lizard Man 7) Battle Ram (back-half!) 8) Roton 9) Multi-Bot 10) Ninjor 11) Dragstor 12) Saurod 13) Blast-Attak 14) Karg 15) Gwildor 16) Lodar 17) Mask of Power Demons

  3. #3
    Sorcerer of Zalesia bcrduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    9,979
    I have to say that I think it's a GOOD thing that they are using softer materials on some of the weapons and interchangeable parts.

    The Evil-Lyn weapons that came with Weapons Pak II are not the same as the ones that came with Evil-Lyn. The ones that came with the figure are soft. That's a good thing.

    I tried changing the crystal to the short wand today an it was virtually impossible without risking a break. There are white stress marks now on the short wand and they started to begin on the actual crystal. It was very frustrating

    SO, I think they need to keep using the soft material.
    A Want List of Sorts: Eldor, Sweet Bee, Arrow, Spinnerella, NA She-Ra, Mermista, Gwildor, Hover-Bots, Tung Lasher, Angella, Ninjor, Huntara, Oo-Larr, Lizard Man, Sssqueeze, Peekablue... and all the other POP & NA characters.

  4. #4
    Eternian Sorcerer zodak74's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Point Dread
    Posts
    11,940
    Cool news about Modulok! And I think $30 to $50 ain't too shabby for a nicely sculpted vehicle... it's just going to limit me buying multiples of 'em.

  5. #5
    Keyboard Warrior The Blue Beetle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    422
    It's gotta be Battle Ram, methinks!

  6. #6
    No Rio? We Riot! TheFallen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,618
    Quote Originally Posted by The Blue Beetle View Post
    It's gotta be Battle Ram, methinks!
    Would that be classed as mid-size?
    The Battle Ram we saw at SDCC is pretty damn big, especially if it is to fit MOTUC figures

  7. #7
    Take a stand... 2015! Zargon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dark Hemisphere - Texas Region
    Posts
    3,071
    Quote Originally Posted by JVS3 View Post
    4. Zargon:
    Since Castle Grayskull's price has been estimated to be $200-$300 (when and if it happens) and figures/beasts run from $20-$40, what would be the estimated prices of the upcoming vehicle(s) by size? (small = Sky Sled-sized, medium = Land Shark-sized, large = Spydor-sized)


    It is a bit too early to tell, but a mid-sized vehicle like the one planned for fall 2011 will likely run between $30 to $50 dollars depending on how complex it is.
    Pretty good answer. Guess we can assume that small vehicles will be $30 or less and large will be $50 or more (hopefully previously mentioned $60 cap, but doubtful). At least the answer wasn't "can't comment on anything past King Hsss, I mean Panthor, at this time...."
    Top Ten MOTUC wants Sagitar, Lizard Man, Tung Lashor, Mermista, Sssqueeze, Ninjor, Great Black Wizard, Fang-or, Dragstor, Peekablue

  8. #8
    Heroic Warrior Ealo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    926
    i hope this means the battle ram isn't coming first - i wasn't very impressed with it (though i'm sure once the 4H give it another going over it might be better).

  9. #9
    Color'licious! JVS3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    29,293
    What????
    Why were you not impressed?
    I was blown away by the Battle Ram.

  10. #10
    Bashasaurus Emiliano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Palermo, Italy
    Posts
    6,267
    Quote Originally Posted by Ealo View Post
    i hope this means the battle ram isn't coming first - i wasn't very impressed with it (though i'm sure once the 4H give it another going over it might be better).
    I'm sure that if you ahd chance to saw it in person you'd totally change your mind

  11. #11
    Heroic Warrior Ealo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    926
    i don't know, maybe it was just the pictures and irl it looks better - but it sort of looked a bit too much like a 5 year old's toy, while the classics have a more nuanced look. not that i hated it and i can appreciate others want it.

  12. #12
    Golems for 2016! AdultCollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,531
    I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of the MOTUC Battle Ram and the vintage Battle Ram, to get an idea of the scale. A picture of a figure mounted on or standing next to the MOTUC Battle Ram would be equally helpful.

    As for my one question: Would Mattel consider remaking Terror Claw Skeletor's claws (the "Terror Claws of Allocca") and including them as a bonus accessory to a new figure in the MOTUC lineup, or would Mattel more likely redesign the whole figure? The old one wasn't much to look at, but the claws were pretty awesome, and in Marvel's Masters of the Universe comic (issue #1) they did not come with a costume change, Skeletor wore his original outfit aside from wielding the claws.
    Last edited by AdultCollector; December 5, 2010 at 09:24pm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •