Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 61

Thread: Answers to WTFWTK 2.79!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Color'licious! JVS3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    29,297

    Answers to WTFWTK 2.79!

    Mattel has once again provided answers to your questions.
    Thanks again to them for taking the time to answer these!
    Check out their answers to your Round 79 questions!

    This round of questions were selected by MOTU_Maniac.
    Thanks to those fans for their help!

    -------------------

    1. bigsexy_j: We hear in answers all the time that design decisions of the figures are left up to the 4H. The 4H designed Stinkor with new forearms and put them on the sides they decided they should be on. Why was the decision made by Mattel then to swap the forearms on Stinkor and change the design of the 4H prototype? Is this not contradictory of all the other times we were told that all these decisions are the 4H's and has nothing to do with engineering or safety standards?

    The Horsemen make sculpting choices (like how many eyes to give Webstor) but it is up to Mattel designers to translate the Horsemen non articulated sculpt into a functional toy and sometimes changes are made for logistical, aesthetic or safety/assembly reasons. The choice to swap Stinkor's arms was made by Mattel design to give Stinkor a little something extra since he reuses so many parts and make him stand out on shelf. Design also changed Horde Prime’s chest form the flat armor lower torso to the muscle torso. Some choices fans may like, others not so much. But at the end of the day the design team makes the final call on the look and functionality of the figures using the Horsemen sculpt as a jumping off point. This has been the same since figure 1.

    2. Canada-Man: Would there be a res-use of Ram Man's buck? And would it be in scale with the vintage toy or be a larger buck to be a bigger dude like in the 200x cartoon?

    We'll have to see when and if we get to Ram Man!

    3. Nemisythe: Considering we are starting to see pullbacks on paint applications (for example: Stinkor's weapons and now the Snake Mountain stands) are we going to see this continue on upcoming figures, beasts, etc?

    The Horsemen often "over deco" figures beyond what we ask for or can afford. We are still delivering $22.00 worth of paint ops on all 2012 figures. Now that figures cost more we have to sometimes reduce deco to keep a figure in cost. In 2013 we will raise prices so we can afford more deco and more accessories.

    4. bskcase: Since it is clear that Snout Spout was defective, can we have a re-release of the figure with a solid plastic snout down the line? I think we are owed that.

    He was not defective. Toys do sometimes break after being played with or posed. If you have a broken toy you can have it replaced by calling customer service for a non broken one.

    5. MOTU_Maniac: Is Mattel considering making Tiered Figure Stands that would work for MOTUC figures (like Mattel did for WWE figures)? I just put up new shelves to expand my collection room and I am already running out of room! Tiered Stands would allow fans to have several rows of figures AND the ability to see all of their lovely faces. They seem to have worked great for the WWE figures!

    A very cool idea. Nothing planned right now but we will see!

    --------------------

    Click here to ask questions in Round 81!
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 1.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 2.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 3.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 4.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 5.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 6.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 7.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 8.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 9.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 10.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 11.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 12.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 13.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 14.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 15.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 16.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 17.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 18.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 19.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 20.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 21.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 22.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 23.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 24.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 25.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 26.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 27.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 28.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 29.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 30.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 31.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 32.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 33.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 34.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 35.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 36.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 37.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 38.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 39.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 40.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 41.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 42.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 43.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 44.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 45.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 46.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 47.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 48.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 49.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 50.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 51.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 52.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 53.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 54.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 55.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 56.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 57.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 58.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 59.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 60.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 61.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 62.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 63.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 64.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 65.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 66.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 67.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 68.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 69.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 70.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 71.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 72.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 73.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 74.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 75.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 76.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 77.
    Click here to read the responses to the questions from Round 78.
    And, have fun discussing Mattel's answers to your Round 79 questions!

  2. #2
    Illumina & Cat please! Darkspecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    14,916
    Quote Originally Posted by JVS3 View Post
    1. bigsexy_j: We hear in answers all the time that design decisions of the figures are left up to the 4H. The 4H designed Stinkor with new forearms and put them on the sides they decided they should be on. Why was the decision made by Mattel then to swap the forearms on Stinkor and change the design of the 4H prototype? Is this not contradictory of all the other times we were told that all these decisions are the 4H's and has nothing to do with engineering or safety standards?

    The Horsemen make sculpting choices (like how many eyes to give Webstor) but it is up to Mattel designers to translate the Horsemen non articulated sculpt into a functional toy and sometimes changes are made for logistical, aesthetic or safety/assembly reasons. The choice to swap Stinkor's arms was made by Mattel design to give Stinkor a little something extra since he reuses so many parts and make him stand out on shelf. Design also changed Horde Prime’s chest form the flat armor lower torso to the muscle torso. Some choices fans may like, others not so much. But at the end of the day the design team makes the final call on the look and functionality of the figures using the Horsemen sculpt as a jumping off point. This has been the same since figure 1.
    Oh REALLY?! That's weird. Both times he was shown he had the smooth lower torso. We recently noticed the crossbow change, but it was always the same lower torso. Now he's wearing bikini armour. That's...pretty darn weird. It also makes him look more like Faceless One instead of different (excuse/explanation for Stinkor's arms). Weird.

    Also...the 4H's sculpts ARE articulated. They have the pins in the elbows and knees. They're not all ONE piece. Who's answering these questions!?
    Take part in Illumina Day! Let people know who she is and help get her in MOTUC.

    http://motuc-illumina.proboards.com/...cgi?board=talk

    You can join the Illumina Facebook page here!

    https://www.facebook.com/Illumina.Sleetah

  3. #3
    Heroic Photog Supporter musclor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wyoming.
    Posts
    1,661
    The snout spout answer really ticks me off. Mine was broken in the package, called Matty the day I received them and they did not have replacement stock. Can't really get it replaced, now, can you?
    Photog is here! thank you, Mattel!

    Now how about some mini-comics love (like Lodar, Geldor, Dakon......)? And Mermista?

  4. #4
    Spoony Bard davidlogan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    4,561
    Wow...some BS answers here. Especially 1 and 4.

    Quote Originally Posted by musclor View Post
    The snout spout answer really ticks me off. Mine was broken in the package, called Matty the day I received them and they did not have replacement stock. Can't really get it replaced, now, can you?
    Same. I called about my Sorceress the day she arrived broken from my sub. I was told there were none for replacements and got a refund minus shipping. Horrible.
    I just published my very first ebook: Malediction! A short story of monsters and magic!
    Buy it now on Amazon or Barnes and Noble!

    Print version, also available!

  5. #5
    Heroic Warrior Darth Daddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Grayskull's basement
    Posts
    320
    Gotta call BS on the Snout Spout answer... the figure IS defective / the figure's trunk material IS defective. Mine is STILL IN THE PACKAGE, mint condition, and the TRUNK IS SPLITTING. I also think it is really lame that the person who answered this question directed the readers to customer service when he/she knows full well there is no stock and no viable or reasonable "replacement" solution.

    If the answer to this question is an example of the "improved" customer service that we're going to get from Matty thanks to their new "internal" division, then color me underwhelmed and highly unimpressed. 8 shades of the color wrong [answer].

    Can you tell I'm mad?
    Last edited by Darth Daddy; May 16, 2012 at 07:54pm.
    Say cheese!!!

  6. #6
    Heroic Warrior
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,136
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Daddy View Post
    Gotta call BS on the Snout Spout answer... the figure IS defective / the figure's trunk material IS defective. Mine is STILL IN THE PACKAGE, mint condition, and the TRUNK IS SPLITTING. I also think it is really lame that the person who answered this question directed the readers to customer service when he/she knows full well there is no stock and no viable or reasonable "replacement" solution.

    If the answer to this question is an example of the "improved" customer service that we're going to get from Matty thanks to their new "internal" division, then color me underwhelmed and highly unimpressed. 8 shades of the color wrong [answer].

    Can you tell I'm mad?
    The "adding insult to injury" part is the fact that months before he shipped fans expressed concern about the material being used in an "Ask Matty", and we were told Mattel had a "crack team of testers" to make sure that didn't happen, everything was "rigorously tested", etc.

    It's a defect because it affects everyone. Mine hasn't split (yet), but it has completely stiffened from it's pliability when it was opened. This was noticeable after just 2-3 months out of the package.

    There is something called "normal wear and tear", and this product doesn't even stand up to zero wear. I took it out, posed it once (didn't really touch the snout except to see it was very pliable when I opened it), and now it's frozen in place. I'd actually be fine with that (or if the figure originally came out that way), but hearing that some people have them MOC and are seeing splits, means it's just a matter of time before they all split, even if we don't handle them. And, unlike a lot of other Mattel goofs, I don't believe there is anything that can be done to repair him even with those of us who do tinker with the figures a bit.

    Let me guess, in a year or two they will admit it, and start taking returns like they did with Goddess, years after the fact.

  7. #7
    Heroic Warrior Nemisythe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Despondos
    Posts
    1,491
    But OH BOY... is Question and Answer #4 gonna open a whole can of worms.....
    'Tis the wind and nothing more.....

  8. #8
    Heroic Warrior Inhibitor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,706
    Wow, talk about chutzpah! There's a fine line between damage control and coverup sometimes...
    Let's just hope the design team learns from this fiasco. We know they got the hint with Snout Spout through Slush Head's arms. That's as close to an admission as we're going to get.

    We knew the score anyway, why ask?
    Your support means more research for the Myostatin-challenged.

  9. #9
    Monster High Crazy Detective Lubic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Calif, USA
    Posts
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Nemisythe View Post
    But OH BOY... is Question and Answer #4 gonna open a whole can of worms.....
    That answer was Terrible.. I have had toys that were broken in the package and I have some break when playing around with them them but that usually happens because there is all ready a defect in the figure but I have never had one break after it was "Posed" and just sitting on the shelf until now. Just a plain rotten answer!! I cant believe this is what they consider customer service and how can they not know THEY DONT HAVE ANYMORE SNOUT SPOUTS!!!

    Plus they make it sound like it is your fault that if you play or pose your figures it is your fault if they break? They should put a warning on the packaging!!!
    Last edited by Detective Lubic; May 16, 2012 at 10:08pm.

  10. #10
    Court Magician
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by davidlogan View Post
    I was told there were none for replacements and got a refund minus shipping. Horrible.
    Is that even legal? I'm pretty sure that if an item is defective or the problem is their error, they are responsible for shipping costs as well. Seriously, you should file a complaint with your state's office of the Attorney General.

  11. #11
    Spoony Bard davidlogan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    4,561
    To those who are saying it probably isn't Scott answering the questions. I agree. It probably isn't. To me it doesn't sound like him at all.

    However, with that said, these are still official Mattel answers right? If this person is not supposed to be speaking on behalf of Mattel then they shouldn't be answering the questions. With that in mind, we have every reason to treat these as just what they are: Official Mattel statements that reflect upon the original author, Scott and Mattel as a whole.

    Am I wrong?
    I just published my very first ebook: Malediction! A short story of monsters and magic!
    Buy it now on Amazon or Barnes and Noble!

    Print version, also available!

  12. #12
    Evil Warrior jibernish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    845
    Quote Originally Posted by musclor View Post
    The snout spout answer really ticks me off. Mine was broken in the package, called Matty the day I received them and they did not have replacement stock. Can't really get it replaced, now, can you?
    Yeah, that one made me mad too even though I didn't buy Snout Spout. So, if he's not considered defective, and more than just a few are broken, then it can only mean that it was designed to work that way. "He was not defective." - Mattel. This is a dishonest statement. Call it a lie or not, it is deceptive and manipulative. I hate it when Matty insults our intelligence like that. It's those kinds of answers that make people so upset with TG, and that give support to those who would call Mattel liars.

    I want to play nice, and I want to have positive feelings for Mattel and for TG, but this kind of statement makes that impossible for me. Don't lie to me. I can see through your statements - it's just legal speak. If you want me as a fan to overlook mistakes and look at this line like a fan rather than just a customer, then you have to be upfront with me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Daddy View Post
    Gotta call BS on the Snout Spout answer... the figure IS defective / the figure's trunk material IS defective. Mine is STILL IN THE PACKAGE, mint condition, and the TRUNK IS SPLITTING. I also think it is really lame that the person who answered this question directed the readers to customer service when he/she knows full well there is no stock and no viable or reasonable "replacement" solution.

    If the answer to this question is an example of the "improved" customer service that we're going to get from Matty thanks to their new "internal" division, then color me underwhelmed and highly unimpressed. 8 shades of the color wrong [answer].

    Can you tell I'm mad?
    Why would you get mad just because someone lied to you? Why get mad when someone who takes your money lies to you in order to keep taking your money? I see no reason to get mad

    Quote Originally Posted by JVS3 View Post
    And I don't think they should be altering the 4H's designs, at least not before going over it with them as the 4H may have a better solution. I guess it's Mattel's right to do so, but changing Stinkor's forearms was clearly a controversial decision that was not liked by many. For Stinkor's sculpt, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Instead, fix Snout Spout.
    Amen to that Val! Don't fix Stinkor - a nearly perfect figure. Fix Snout Spout. Or King Hsss. Or Roboto. Or GG, or Digital River, or Cornerstone Logistics, or the inept PR department blah blah blah.......

    Quote Originally Posted by JonWes View Post
    It's funny, Mattel just released info about how to get a refund your Stay Puft, and it's exactly the right tone and execution for these situations:

    http://www.mattycollector.com/store/...StayPuftRefund

    Which kind of makes the stance taken with Snout Spout even more strange.
    And I read that and was feeling a little bad for being so negative about Mattel's handling of MOTUC. But this is the last straw. I wont' feel bad about being negative against this line again. They are playing me for a fool. If someone is a jerk to you only 33% of the time, does that make them a good friend? Nope. Mattel stinks. MOTU is awesome. I can separate the two.

    Quote Originally Posted by He-Kal View Post
    While I agree that the response to Snout Spout is a problem--to suggest people should be fired over the altered appearance of a figure (Stinkor) is a little silly don't you think?
    I'm not advocating that anyone be fired. But everyone at Mattel's job essentially comes down to making toys that will sell, or supporting the effort to make those toys. And any employee that gets in the way of making and delivering the product to as many customers as possible should have their future with the company evaluated. I mean with Mattel, it's all about money. And to get that money, it's all about the toys. You mess up the toys, you mess up the cash flow, you have to go.

    Now sure people make mistakes and I don't advocate for firing people after 1 mistake. But this whole transforming a prototype into a production piece process has gone wrong many times and in many ways. So I think some re-evaluation of the people who perform that task is called for. It is costing Mattel sales.
    Last edited by jibernish; May 18, 2012 at 09:32am. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  13. #13
    Heroic Warrior
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    302
    To Mattel: If you guys want to talk about Stinkor's issue don't ever put it in the same conversation as Battlegroud Evil-lyn's forearms, She-ra's head, Sorceress's wings or Horde Prime's torso. Enough of that already! Some of your fans will just not eat that crap and we're starting to get really sick of that BS talk over and over again. Stop it!

    Stinkor's swap of forearms will never - and was never intended to - solve any functional problem with the figure or create a logical aesthetical upgrade, because that problem was never there in the first place. Instead it will only lead to an aesthetical aberration due to improperly placing of the forearms, creating an anatomical imperfection. As seen previously with King Hsss and Roboto, where an entire run of figures got incorrectly assembled.

    And by the way, just go ahead and listen to Roast Gooble Dinner episode 43 and hear what Emilliano has to say about that. By that time he was talking about King Hsss, but it's just nice to hear that the same points could be brought to discuss what's wrong with Stinkor. Pretty cool huh?

    So it's obvious that you should discuss Stinkor's situation alongside King Hsss's and Roboto's swapped limbs. This was a mistake. If it was on purpose or not I don't care. It should be acknowledge by Mattel as a bad decision at the very least.

    I know that this was already talked about and we have already made our point, but I will keep bringing this up anytime we get these BS answers from Mattel about their screw ups.

    I'm not ok with having more figures ruined in the future, and just have Mattel telling us to live with it and enjoy our defective figures. So I will continue to battle, trying to prevent this to ever happen again.

  14. #14
    Heroic Warrior darkmoon766's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,166
    Quote Originally Posted by JVS3 View Post
    The Horsemen make sculpting choices (like how many eyes to give Webstor) but it is up to Mattel designers to translate the Horsemen non articulated sculpt into a functional toy and sometimes changes are made for logistical, aesthetic or safety/assembly reasons. The choice to swap Stinkor's arms was made by Mattel design to give Stinkor a little something extra since he reuses so many parts and make him stand out on shelf. Design also changed Horde Prime’s chest form the flat armor lower torso to the muscle torso. Some choices fans may like, others not so much. But at the end of the day the design team makes the final call on the look and functionality of the figures using the Horsemen sculpt as a jumping off point. This has been the same since figure 1.
    Uh, OK. Tell me why, at this point, we should not literally get out the torches and pitch forks? They now feel they have with impunity the ability to swap around parts from a presented 4 Horsemen prototype without consulting the customer base? What happened to "we leave these decisions tho the 4 Horsemen"? This is the first time I have been literally enraged by a response given by their PR team, who ever wrote it. I have been enraged by snafus(mistakes happen) but outright saying "tough turkey" we reserve the right to mess things up if we want, the 4 horsemen are just low end employees in this line, is a slap in the face. Good luck selling me the 2013 sub. I have bought them all until now and intended to until this very moment. If I can no longer trust that the figures will be as the horsemen intended, why should I put my money in ahead of time? I will just wait until I see an actual production figure before I order to make sure it has not been "Design Teamed". I suggest a real change in attitude when it comes to design of these toys between the 4 horsemen and Mattel "design". The Sorceress' wings for functionality is one thing, Stinkor's arms and Primes abs are another. What is next my friends? What is next? Will Spikor have Teela boots? Will Mosquitor have Roboto's Torso?
    Last edited by darkmoon766; May 16, 2012 at 08:26pm.

  15. #15
    Heroic Warrior
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    2,791
    Quote Originally Posted by darkmoon766 View Post

    Uh, OK. Tell me why, at this point, we should not literally get out the torches and pitch forks? They now feel they have with impunity the ability to swap around parts from a presented 4 Horsemen prototype without consulting the customer base? What happened to "we leave these decisions tho the 4 Horsemen"? This is the first time I have been literally enraged by a response given by their PR team, who ever wrote it. I have been enraged by snafus(mistakes happen) but outright saying "tough turkey" we reserve the right to mess things up if we want, the 4 horsemen are just low end employees in this line, is a slap in the face. Good luck selling me the 2013 sub. I have bought them all until now and intended to until this very moment. If I can no longer trust that the figures will be as the horsemen intended, why should I put my money in ahead of time? I will just wait until I see an actual production figure before I order to make sure it has not been "Design Teamed". I suggest a real change in attitude when it comes to design of these toys between the 4 horsemen and Mattel "design". The Sorceress' wings for functionality is one thing, Stinkor's arms and Primes abs are another. What is next my friends? What is next? Will Spikor have Teela boots? Will Mosquitor have Roboto's Torso?

    What about switching the boots on ToD Sorceress?

    Did we like that? or throw a fit over that one? I was never gonna get her, so didn't pay attention. Sounds like the same situation.


    Honestly, I think the fact that they say they've been doing it this way since the beginning makes this a non-issue.


    The one that bugs me the most is Snout Spout answer... He IS defective. Plain and simple. You have a toy that will break. What is the difference between that and... ummm... Toyota issueing a statement that 'Ohhhhh yeah.... we know occassionally the brakes lock on that car... and a minority of the owners blow up and die.... Sooooo we won't make them THAT way any more. But Yeah. the 2012 toyota deathtrap is NOT defective. That's just the way it is!


    An honest answer is simply that Yeah, it sucks... the snout is bad material... we won't use that again (see slushhead), There is no intention on rereleasing this version.... but the 200x head would be a great refresh down the line.... can't announce anything past Frosta right now.

    But really. "he is not defective'... that's garbage O.o

  16. #16
    Heroic Warrior darkmoon766's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,166
    Quote Originally Posted by phantom1592 View Post
    What about switching the boots on ToD Sorceress?
    That was changed well before production, and does not change much on the over all aesthetic. It also was not designed by the 4 horsemen, the original Sorceress was. The Idea to make it a variant and then change something to make it more accurate to the source material and explain why well before it was on sale is completely different than the Prime's ab crunch changed only on the production figure.

    Of course I also agree with you on the "Snout Spout Issue". All of these answers are either uninformed or infuriating. What happened here? Scott, a little damage control please?

    EDIT: Ok, answer number 3 was not "infuriating" or "misinformed", I assume anyway.
    Last edited by darkmoon766; May 16, 2012 at 09:02pm.

  17. #17
    Ray of Sunshine Lookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Farmington Hills, MI
    Posts
    2,089
    I think Mattel design proved with the 200X line that they are lousy. Sorry to sound like an ass, but the things that Mattel does in-house suck. Lack of reasoning and a crummy imagination. How can they not know that switching forearms would look wrong on Stinkor? Thie mistakes made are sometimes accidental (snout spout) but sometimes pure stupidity (Stinkor and horde prime now too). Please stop "improving" things until 2013 when my sub runs out so I don't get anymore "non-defective" figures.

    Sincerely,

    A Former Subscriber
    Jeremy Soronen
    My Collection

  18. #18
    Heroic Warrior Inhibitor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,706
    Quote Originally Posted by phantom1592 View Post
    What about switching the boots on ToD Sorceress?

    Did we like that? or throw a fit over that one? I was never gonna get her, so didn't pay attention. Sounds like the same situation.


    Honestly, I think the fact that they say they've been doing it this way since the beginning makes this a non-issue.
    The situation with Stinkor would be more akin to a Sorceress that had her left and right boots switched. Unless they're designing a new mutant buck, they ought to leave basic anatomy alone. The "had to differentiate Stinkor from Merman" bit is a total wash. After the extra head and dramatically different color scheme? Nah.
    Your support means more research for the Myostatin-challenged.

  19. #19
    Heroic Warrior bigsexy_j's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB
    Posts
    778
    ^^
    and they are brand new forearms. All the more reason this looks like an oh crap, well lets say that's the way it supposed to be.

    J

  20. #20
    Heroic Warrior orbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,385
    Quote Originally Posted by Inhibitor View Post
    The situation with Stinkor would be more akin to a Sorceress that had her left and right boots switched. Unless they're designing a new mutant buck, they ought to leave basic anatomy alone. The "had to differentiate Stinkor from Merman" bit is a total wash. After the extra head and dramatically different color scheme? Nah.
    And doesnt he have the furry buck too? POW! And no twisted anatomy needed, just a furry body, new paint, head, and armor and Stinkor totally rocks. Now he just really rocks.

  21. #21
    Heroic Warrior
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Toyguru's closet ^_^
    Posts
    2,152
    Quote Originally Posted by orbles View Post
    And doesnt he have the furry buck too? POW! And no twisted anatomy needed, just a furry body, new paint, head, and armor and Stinkor totally rocks. Now he just really rocks.
    I'm almost glad that I have a serious allergy to perfume and have to customize my own Stinkor now. I have to say that with seeing all the answers admins on the site have done lately on Matty that perhaps it wasn't Scott who answered this round?

  22. #22
    Heroic Warrior Darth Daddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Grayskull's basement
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by phantom1592 View Post
    An honest answer is simply that Yeah, it sucks... the snout is bad material... we won't use that again (see slushhead), There is no intention on rereleasing this version.... but the 200x head would be a great refresh down the line.... can't announce anything past Frosta right now.
    I agree with you 1000%. This would have been a MUCH better way to craft (and deliver) an answer. You should fire your resume over to Mattel; they could make great use of your talents!

    Quote Originally Posted by Inhibitor View Post
    The "had to differentiate Stinkor from Merman" bit is a total wash. After the extra head and dramatically different color scheme?
    As well as the furry body, neck piece, and the chest armor with 200X inspired attachments (like the mask, tanks, and lever.) The things that you and I mentioned are DRAMATICALLY more quick read than the forearm swap. With all of these other changes nobody would have ever locked their gaze on the forearms (and then take a step back and let the full figure soak in) and say... "Man, I feel so ripped off... all that money for a repainted Mer-Man. I am a chump for buying this."
    Last edited by Darth Daddy; May 16, 2012 at 09:34pm. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
    Say cheese!!!

  23. #23
    A Real Master Of Arms nato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,150
    He was not defective. Toys do sometimes break after being played with or posed. If you have a broken toy you can have it replaced by calling customer service for a non broken one.

    Wow!! Talk about not owning up to responsibility. It would be like my child breaking a glass lamp in the living room and telling me that it was going to break eventually because it was made of glass. Sorry, but something that does not function the way it is supposed to, especially not even in a year........is defective. If I had a DVD player quit working after a month of purchase....am I being told it's not defective because I was able to use it for 3 weeks? Just wow!


    And as for answer #1 with the Stinkor forearms, I'm still calling BS....How many figures do we have now that have a lot of re-used parts and nothing was changed on them? Then all of a sudden with Stinkor, they decide it would be cool to put backwards forearms on? Don't worry Mattel, we the customers will know the truth when people pop off the forearms on Stinkor and see if the R and the L are in the right place.
    Keep The "Classicized" 200x Heads in MOTUC!

    Matty Savings For the Year because of No DOS Purchases: $210

  24. #24
    Got Filmation? shadowfall1976's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    A Damn Mitten....
    Posts
    6,516
    Quote Originally Posted by JVS3 View Post
    1. bigsexy_j: We hear in answers all the time that design decisions of the figures are left up to the 4H. The 4H designed Stinkor with new forearms and put them on the sides they decided they should be on. Why was the decision made by Mattel then to swap the forearms on Stinkor and change the design of the 4H prototype? Is this not contradictory of all the other times we were told that all these decisions are the 4H's and has nothing to do with engineering or safety standards?

    The Horsemen make sculpting choices (like how many eyes to give Webstor) but it is up to Mattel designers to translate the Horsemen non articulated sculpt into a functional toy and sometimes changes are made for logistical, aesthetic or safety/assembly reasons. The choice to swap Stinkor's arms was made by Mattel design to give Stinkor a little something extra since he reuses so many parts and make him stand out on shelf. Design also changed Horde Prime’s chest form the flat armor lower torso to the muscle torso. Some choices fans may like, others not so much. But at the end of the day the design team makes the final call on the look and functionality of the figures using the Horsemen sculpt as a jumping off point. This has been the same since figure 1.


    4. bskcase: Since it is clear that Snout Spout was defective, can we have a re-release of the figure with a solid plastic snout down the line? I think we are owed that.

    He was not defective. Toys do sometimes break after being played with or posed. If you have a broken toy you can have it replaced by calling customer service for a non broken one.
    #1) Stinkor looked different enough with accessories and his color scheme to not need anything extra, the forearms were fine as was on the prototype, stupid choice to make, I don't care if they make the choices or not, just because you think it's a good idea.....it's probably not!.

    For future reference....

    Don't change the anatomy of the figures!!!
    The fins go on the outside!!!

    #4) Snout Spout was defective, if not how do you explain breaking in the package, and for those who only touched their figures once? Arrogant answer, and completely wrong....
    2 of my 3 local friends that have Snout, both MOSC, and both trunks have split and cracked....IN THE PACKAGE....How is that not a defect?
    Last edited by shadowfall1976; May 17, 2012 at 10:11am.
    Recent....Flogg
    Coming....
    Wanted....Entrapa, Light Hope, (A real) Filmation Hordak & Clawful
    Considering....
    Needed....Dragstor

    Oh man, did I forget to use these [sarcasm][/sarcasm] again? Sorry....

    Check here for my My collection page, MOTU and more!

  25. #25
    Heroic Warrior THINKOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    169
    Again the same answers for SS's trunk and Stinkor's forearm. If the line is doing so well as TG just recently claimed, why is it a problem to reissue one fixed figure per year, in a small quantity? This is SS, King Hisss, Roboto we are talking about (Yes, GG too).
    Evil Master of Thinking!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •