I care because we've been a friendly community here for years and I care about your opinions. If you'd rather I didn't, I guess I can change my perspective.
I care because unlike those other figures you passed on, you (and a few others) made a point of making it obvious, in a public way, why you don't like this one. Why bother stating the negativity. The thread started out as one about the Ram Man delay. Why did it have to turn into one about Netossa?
I care because Scott will likely read through two pages and see a few posts like the ones I quoted, and that will further encourage him to continue thinking the She-Ra characters aren't worth it. I think, to Scott, Netossa = Glimmer = Perfuma = Angella = Flutterina = Mermista, etc.
It's frustrating. He would be wrong.
I didn't want or like Vikor or Demo-Man. I don't need the Griffin and think its boring. I didn't need the Snake Warriors two-pack either. However, I can see their value and their beauty.
I never made a point to put down those reveals.
It's a difficult thing. I guess I'd ask people to just be a little more sensitive to the fact that many of us who collect this line (and bought multiple subs so that we COULD have a Ram Mam figure at all) do want more pop and NA characters, and that when there are negative posts about certain releases, just for the sake of negativity, it encourages a brand manager who already doesn't "get" the appeal of those characters, to think no one wants them.
It's also no fun to come to a fan community I've loved for 10 years, only to read friends' comments that say things like "boring," "yuck," and "waste of money" about my most anticipated figure of Q1.
The 4H read these comments. They probably think this fan community has nothing but bratty complaint-filled regard for them.
You might think I'm wrong, but I'd bet I'm right.