I would but I can't see a poll?
NO! Make it non-removable for the snuggest fit
Yes! It's fine as it is
Yes! BUT move the tabs to the back of the armor and make it as thin as possible around the lats.
Toyguru wants to know so vote my friends
Most Wanted MOTUC: Dragstor, Kittrina, Lizard man, Filmation Merman, Blast Attack, Angella, Dragoon, Tung Lashor
Option three- yes, but with tab movement!
AUDACIEUX ET TENACE
FS MOTU Vintage figures in Zoloworld cases and mini comics:
I want to vote fine as it is, because maybe there was a better reason to move them since they normally did put them in the back. The move forward seemed a fluke.
However if it was just a descision to try something, they should decide to return to how it was. Back makes the most sense.
Either way dont do it non-removable unless it calls for it like some of the already non removable armours.
Please, just move the tabs to the back or make it the snap on armor. Less Sea-Hawk, more Man-at-Arms or Battle Armor variants. No more fatty boom-boom.
It's all been done before. Everything to say has already been said. Do me a solid and pretend I posted something witty and and original here
As I said in another thread, one of MOTU's most distinguishing features has always been removeable armor. It would not be the same otherwise.
Definitely option three.
**Staunch FILMation Subscription supporter!!! **** NEEDS a New Adventures Subscription!!!**
MOTUC NEEDS more TROLLANS !!!
Not to sound like a creepy cheerleader for Uki, but it's nice to know there is at least one person on this forum who is extremely positive & friendly all the time. I don't think I could be that nice even if you paid me. If we ever give out awards for "forum member of the month", Uki gets my vote. -Mr. Shokoti
Way to Go Club Etheria!
I still don't see why we're even having this discussion? This was brought up when Seahawk got all puffy and it should've been fixed by now.