Which Faker do you prefer for loose display? MotU, 200x or MotUC

[jesstertwo]

Simple enough, given the option to display one figure on your shelf, which do you like the best and why?

[shadowfall1976]

I prefer the Classics version, to the Vintage simply because it's modern, yet Vintage. And I don't like the 200X figures at all, aside from maybe the Mantenna staction.

[Wundar_Grayskull]

I voted classics. I have all 4 versions of Faker, and love both classics versions, but love the 200X exclusive as well. I believe my fav classics version to display is the Battle Armor SDCC version.

[MrRoboto]

I have all three and the one that i like most on display is the Classics version. Detail is of course far superior.

[Benedict Judas Hel]

MOTUC is the way to go.

[Uki]

Classics, in every instance, is superior for me.

- - - Updated - - -

Classics, in every instance, is superior for me.

[Jean]

I must go with vintage, simply because as a kid, that was my favorite figure from the early waves, plus I got him in the Evil Warriors 3-pack which was just about the coolest way to get MOTU figures back then!

[iron_pride]

MOTUC for me!

[Collec-Tor]

Classics. There's a reason this line is still running, and got started in the first place- these figures are superior to all previous versions.

[Ornclown]

Not a big fan of the 200X version, and my vintage Fakers are in storage.....

MOTUC wins by default!

[baronterror]

as with anything masters classics because classics is my new definative if it exists in classics.

[kylun flac]

he's not necessary for display since he is not a core character, but this guy has such an awesome paint job I keep him up on display most of the time.

[FAKER II]

That's tough. In general, I like MOTUC way more than 200X. But the MOTUC Faker could be better. He could have the news Vikor style boots. He could have had black bracelets and belt. His armor could have done without that dark wash. The 200X Faker on the other hand is as good as they could have made it.