I'm sure if you were selling one, you would have pointed out there was an issue when describing the item.
I mean - come on - this is pretty bad and wasn't included in the pics. It wasn't a 'bargain price' to start with.
it was not disclosed and I wouldn't have bought it otherwise. It was not ultra cheap - missing the 'vintage head' and was a fair price for that.
Now its not really fixed 'good as it should be' - its got 4 clicks now instead of 3 and unknown if it will hold.
If I were selling it, I would have disclosed the fault and included it in the photos. I've sold a few (facebook/gumtree) I no longer wanted and always pointed out each fault and gladly lost sales due to it. As a fellow collector - I know people get disheartened if its not what was expected.
Even going as far as confirming they know the faults before they paid me, as some missed the faults even though they were listed. I've had people pull out of the sale thanking me for pointing out the issues (you'd be surprised how many people dont read descriptions and look at all the photos).
The seller offered a return right off the bat when I asked if he knew about the issue - I suggested a part refund as it would have cost more in return postage that its worth. I accepted the first number he threw at me and left excellent feedback.
My thought was, I can display him with the 'damaged' armour section - which wasn't the intent. The saving made him worth keeping.
I took to the idea of fixing it after - not before - so there was no guarantee it could even work or make it worse. Though with the discount its worth attempting a repair, there was a bit of risk to the mechanism involved when using glue.
If I ever were to sell him, I'd disclose the repair and how I did it.
Sorry if I came across as being hard on the seller - I don't believe I was and the outcome was fair.