
Originally Posted by
Rikki Roxx
I relent that this isn't the appropriate thread to discuss it, but I felt like asking since it was a "Hey, since I've got you..." kind of moment.
I don't know. To me the whole "It's a Filmation sequel" thing ONLY ever sounded like Smith getting too excited and saying dumb things, things he thought people would want to hear. The fact that they immediately went "Well... I mean it ISN'T actually, but..." was good enough for me to accept that it wasn't going to have anything to do with Filmation except some of the character designs. And I do question why anyone, anywhere, thought it actually was going to be a "real" sequel or follow-up, to the point where they'd be so mad that it wasn't. "Because they said so... ONE time!" kind of doesn't seem like enough. Because to their "credit", they immediately took it back.
I don't know. There's plenty about that show that is worthy of debate but that one point seems kind of like making a mountain out of a molehill, to me. They probably only ever even said it at all because "It's like a hybrid of Filmation with the 200X reboot" is very clunky from a marketing perspective, even if it's about a thousand times more accurate to what the show actually is. Plus, "nobody" watched the 200X show so I'm not shocked the marketing folks didn't bring it up, even though they might've saved themselves some scorn if they had.
So again, "since I've got you" and because I'm genuinely curious... if they had said THAT, instead - That MOTU:R was a Filmation/200X hybrid, which is more accurate - would you dislike the series AS much? I mean I'm sure there's other things about it which you don't like, and that's fine, I'm not really wondering about any of that. I'm simply asking whether or not you'd dislike it AS much if that one bit of marketing spin were changed.
Thank you for taking the time to indulge my curiosity, it's very much appreciated.
They said lots of stuff. Including "We're trying to recapture what it FELT like to watch Filmation at 3, 4, 5 years old... the show had no actual stakes, but at that age you could believe there were." That, to me, was the most honest bit of "spin" they put out.
Anything being a "spiritual sequel" means "It's not really, but maybe if you squint and fudge some details." Which means it simply isn't.